House Passes $70B Immigration Bill     06/10 06:22

   A bill to provide nearly $70 billion for immigration enforcement narrowly 
passed the House on Tuesday and now goes to President Donald Trump for his 
signature, bolstering the administration's deportation agenda for the remainder 
of his time in the White House.

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- A bill to provide nearly $70 billion for immigration 
enforcement narrowly passed the House on Tuesday and now goes to President 
Donald Trump for his signature, bolstering the administration's deportation 
agenda for the remainder of his time in the White House.

   Republicans used their majority to get the bill over the finish line, 
funding a pair of Homeland Security agencies through the next three years. The 
bill passed by a vote of 214-212, over the objections of Democrats. Trump is 
expected to sign it into law on Wednesday.

   The White House says the bill will provide $38 billion for Immigration and 
Customs Enforcement, $26 billion for the Border Patrol and another $5 billion 
to cover unforeseen costs. It frontloads routine annual funding, ensuring a 
virtually uninterrupted flow of money as the Trump administration seeks to 
deport some 1 million people per year.

   Speaker Mike Johnson needed near-perfect attendance and unity on his side to 
complete weeks of action. The legislation got sidetracked over $1 billion for 
White House security, including for Trump's new ballroom, and a $1.8 billion 
fund to compensate his allies who claim they have been unjustly investigated 
and prosecuted. Those proposals proved politically toxic and were scrapped.

   Now, the bill is focused entirely on immigration enforcement, a topic that 
Republicans have treated as a defining issue between the two major political 
parties and one they hope will carry them to victory in this year's midterm 
elections.

   "It's long overdue," said Johnson, R-La., of the bill. "We have to fund 
border security and immigration enforcement, and it's sad that Republicans have 
to do it on our own."

   But Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas called it a "slush fund for ICE."

   Funding accelerates Trump's deportation agenda

   The funding comes on top of the nearly $140 billion that the 
Republican-controlled Congress gave ICE and Customs and Border Protection last 
year as part of Trump's tax and spending cuts bill.

   Democrats objected to giving the agencies more money without significant 
changes in the way they operate after the deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good 
in Minneapolis. For example, Democrats insisted that agents remove masks and be 
required to display their ID badges during enforcement operations and that they 
get a judicial warrant before entering private property. Instead, the funding 
will come with virtually no strings attached.

   Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York said Republicans weren't 
focused on the top priorities of the American people and have cut access to 
Medicaid and nutrition assistance through Trump's earlier tax and spending cut 
bill.

   "Republicans have now come back for more, to give ICE and Donald Trump's 
violent mass deportation machine another $70 billion blank check, with no 
oversight, no accountability and no guardrails," Jeffries said.

   House Majority Leader Steve Scalise countered that Democrats were not 
adequately supportive of law enforcement.

   "Make no mistake, if you're voting yes, you're not only voting to secure 
America's border, you're voting to fund law enforcement," Scalise said. "And if 
you vote no, you are voting to defund the police."

   Homeland Security faced the longest shutdown in history

   The package is the result of a monthslong standoff in Congress after 
Democrats refused to fund the Department of Homeland Security in the wake of 
the immigration enforcement actions in Minneapolis and other American cities, 
leading to the longest shutdown in agency history.

   Negotiations had been underway with the White House to alter ICE operations 
as Democrats were demanding. When those negotiations failed, Republicans turned 
to a complicated procedural maneuver to get around the filibuster and pass the 
immigration funding with no Democratic votes.

   Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the chairman of the Budget Committee, said 
the money would provide "regular, normal funding" that ICE and the Border 
Patrol would get through the annual budgeting process.

   "And we're going to do it, not for one year, but for three years, so we 
don't end up here again."

   The Senate completed its work on the legislation last week during an 
overnight session on a nearly party-line vote, with Sen. Lisa Murkowski of 
Alaska the only Republican to oppose it.

   Money comes at a pivotal time for Trump's immigration agenda

   The money will come at a pivotal time for the Department of Homeland 
Security, which is under new leadership after Trump replaced Kristi Noem with 
new Secretary Markwayne Mullin in March.

   While Mullin has vowed to keep the department out of the headlines, the 
administration is under pressure from anti-immigration advocates to deliver on 
Trump's campaign promise of the largest deportation operation in American 
history.

   At the same time, the administration is making it more difficult for certain 
legal immigrants to remain in the U.S. with Temporary Protective Status or to 
obtain green cards.

   Lawmakers clash over DHS priorities

   On the House side, Johnson had little margin for error. Rep. Kevin Kiley, 
I-Calif., ended up siding with Democrats on the party-line vote.

   Leading up to the vote, Democrats portrayed DHS as an agency that has used 
its new resources to buy private jets for its leadership, warehouse immigrants 
in deplorable conditions and attack U.S. citizens.

   "Republican leadership likes to talk a lot about common sense, but where is 
the common sense in giving this federal agency essentially unlimited funds 
without a single reform in place?" asked Rep. Pete Aguilar, chair of the House 
Democratic Caucus.

   Republicans countered that they were fulfilling their duty to safeguard the 
nation and support the men and women charged with enforcing the law.

   "Democrats can say whatever they want, but what it's about is public safety. 
What's it about is keeping Americans safe," said Rep. Michelle Fischbach, 
R-Minn.